By Matthew Dewar, March 16, 2021
Coyness is a trait that does not belong in the termination process as RTO Asset Management recently learned to its chagrin.
When initially questioned whether he was having a romance with a direct report that he had hired, James Abrams flatly denied the accusations. His employer proceeded to conduct an investigation in which Abrams’s report in fact, acknowledged the relationship. When confronted with his subordinate’s statement, Abrams then admitted to the affair.
By all accounts, RTO had just cause to terminate on grounds of lack of candour and conflict of interest. It opted, however, to inform Abrams that it was dismissing him on a without cause basis. The record of employment that it issued gave similar non-culpable reasons for the termination.
Emboldened, Abrams’s response was to sue for wrongful dismissal. Only then did RTO argue that it had cause based on his behaviours.
In a 43-page decision, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal sided with Abrams and awarded him with 24 months of notice. The employer was bound by its written letter of termination that communicated the firing was without cause as well as its statements to Service Canada on the Record of Employment. Having chosen to terminate him without cause, it was too late to rely on just cause at trial.
The lessons of this case to employers are stark reminders on the harsh scrutiny that courts apply to the documentation of terminations of employees:
# employment law; record of employment; workplace relationships; termination letters; termination for cause; termination without cause
Thank you for signing up to receive our newsletter. Watch your mailbox for the next edition!
141 Adelaide Street West
Suite 420
Toronto, ON M5H 3L5
© 2024 Duntrune LLP.
Privacy Policy